Comments for ImageIngester Blog http://imageingester.com/wp News about ImageIngester and other digital photography products Tue, 09 Sep 2008 01:50:07 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 Comment on Introducing ImageIngester Version 3 by marc http://imageingester.com/wp/?p=4#comment-89 marc Tue, 09 Sep 2008 01:50:07 +0000 http://imageingester.com/wp/?p=4#comment-89 Cassie--<p>It's stable enough... I just haven't changed the maturity indicator. You can go ahead and use it.<p>--Marc Cassie–

It’s stable enough… I just haven’t changed the maturity indicator. You can go ahead and use it.

–Marc

]]> Comment on Introducing ImageIngester Version 3 by Cassandra Chambliss http://imageingester.com/wp/?p=4#comment-88 Cassandra Chambliss Tue, 09 Sep 2008 00:33:32 +0000 http://imageingester.com/wp/?p=4#comment-88 Marc, I've been looking forward to integrating II into my workflow (I'm a DAM Book/ExpressionMedia user). When will version 3 be out of the beta stage? Seems like it would be better to start off with that once it's out. Any thoughts? --Cassie Marc, I’ve been looking forward to integrating II into my workflow (I’m a DAM Book/ExpressionMedia user). When will version 3 be out of the beta stage? Seems like it would be better to start off with that once it’s out. Any thoughts? –Cassie

]]> Comment on New LRViewer version supports Lightroom 2 catalogs by marc http://imageingester.com/wp/?p=28#comment-69 marc Mon, 25 Aug 2008 18:38:57 +0000 http://imageingester.com/wp/?p=28#comment-69 Bruno: Does this device produce a GPX file that is compatible with II? Are you able to do the tagging that way? --Marc Bruno: Does this device produce a GPX file that is compatible with II? Are you able to do the tagging that way? –Marc

]]> Comment on New LRViewer version supports Lightroom 2 catalogs by marc http://imageingester.com/wp/?p=28#comment-68 marc Mon, 25 Aug 2008 17:15:12 +0000 http://imageingester.com/wp/?p=28#comment-68 Yes, LRVmaker works OK with LR2 catalogs. Yes, LRVmaker works OK with LR2 catalogs.

]]> Comment on New LRViewer version supports Lightroom 2 catalogs by Bruno http://imageingester.com/wp/?p=28#comment-59 Bruno Fri, 22 Aug 2008 11:13:39 +0000 http://imageingester.com/wp/?p=28#comment-59 Hi if my understanding is correct, it seems that GPSBabel supports Wintec-WBT-201 files. Will you add this device to the GPS Panel? Hi

if my understanding is correct, it seems that GPSBabel supports Wintec-WBT-201 files. Will you add this device to the GPS Panel?

]]> Comment on New LRViewer version supports Lightroom 2 catalogs by Wim Spijkervet http://imageingester.com/wp/?p=28#comment-56 Wim Spijkervet Mon, 18 Aug 2008 12:45:34 +0000 http://imageingester.com/wp/?p=28#comment-56 Does LRVmaker also supports Lightroom 2 catalogs?? Does LRVmaker also supports Lightroom 2 catalogs??

]]> Comment on Proposed New ImageIngester Preset Design by Dan Kabat http://imageingester.com/wp/?p=23#comment-52 Dan Kabat Wed, 06 Aug 2008 19:42:18 +0000 http://imageingester.com/wp/?p=23#comment-52 Marc - Looks good - thank you for the thought and work, I really like this concept. Would like to add for your thought - might be nice to make any entry into the "Notes for Next Ingestion" field saved. Where I am having a problem is individually ingesting from from multiple cameras and then reingesting these in one big ingestion. Since the starting number keeps incrementing every time you ingest, I have no idea what number to start with for my final combined camera ingestion. If I could just use the "Notes" field to do this, it would help. Thank you Dan Marc – Looks good – thank you for the thought and work, I really like this concept. Would like to add for your thought – might be nice to make any entry into the “Notes for Next Ingestion” field saved. Where I am having a problem is individually ingesting from from multiple cameras and then reingesting these in one big ingestion. Since the starting number keeps incrementing every time you ingest, I have no idea what number to start with for my final combined camera ingestion. If I could just use the “Notes” field to do this, it would help.

Thank you
Dan

]]> Comment on Proposed New ImageIngester Preset Design by Dave Balardini http://imageingester.com/wp/?p=23#comment-51 Dave Balardini Wed, 06 Aug 2008 12:36:34 +0000 http://imageingester.com/wp/?p=23#comment-51 Marc-We have corresponded several times regarding these issues, as II has developed. I am very much encouraged by the proposed New Design Presets. II is already a major part of my workflow and I anticipate that these "improvements" will just make it more valuable. My hats off to you for being so responsive to the suggestions of your fellow photographers (and customers). Can't wait to take it for a test drive. --Dave Marc-We have corresponded several times regarding these issues, as II has developed. I am very much encouraged by the proposed New Design Presets. II is already a major part of my workflow and I anticipate that these “improvements” will just make it more valuable. My hats off to you for being so responsive to the suggestions of your fellow photographers (and customers). Can’t wait to take it for a test drive.

–Dave

]]> Comment on Introducing ImageIngester Version 3 by Adrian http://imageingester.com/wp/?p=4#comment-45 Adrian Sat, 02 Aug 2008 12:17:28 +0000 http://imageingester.com/wp/?p=4#comment-45 Marc, great new ingester. One addition would help... that is the ability for the presets to remember more than 1 file number. When the preset is changed the file number could be unique to that preset. This would help when using unique number progressions for different jobs. Thanks for building this tool. Marc, great new ingester. One addition would help… that is the ability for the presets to remember more than 1 file number. When the preset is changed the file number could be unique to that preset. This would help when using unique number progressions for different jobs. Thanks for building this tool.

]]> Comment on Introducing ImageIngester Version 3 by Doug Johnson http://imageingester.com/wp/?p=4#comment-42 Doug Johnson Sun, 27 Jul 2008 03:10:23 +0000 http://imageingester.com/wp/?p=4#comment-42 Marc, as I said in a previous note, ImageIngester is maturing well. My only quibble, and it is a petty one indeed, is with two UI issues. First, as I try to replicate the metadata in my pre-v3 template, I'm not clearly seeing my results. For example, I create my own Photographer data and save it with a unique name. Then I do the same for the Rights fields saving them with a unique name. Then I tried to create a Preset that calls my Photographer and Rights data. So far, so good. However, when I "save" the Master Preset that is current, it saves but the Preset field goes blank. Although the Photographer and Rights fields still show my named sets. It seems to me that it would be preferable to continue to show the name of the Preset in use rather than displaying nothing. Second issue: when I try to save the Master Preset, sometimes I get a warning to the effect "There are unsaved metadata. OK to lose?" which provokes anxiety but is not a helpful message because I have already saved the three presets I've described above. It it telling me I will lose the blank metadata fields that were the default? Although I saw this message multiple times tonight, I cannot recreate it just now. Do I need to do a SaveAs to a new name rather than reusing the old one, the convention I'm used to? I'd love to have you say, "This is covered in the Manual. If you would take time to read it, all would be answered." I might disagree with the the way you programmed it but I would understand it. Thanks again for building such a great tool, dj I like the asterisk showing a "dirty" condition to prompt me to consider doing a save. Marc, as I said in a previous note, ImageIngester is maturing well. My only quibble, and it is a petty one indeed, is with two UI issues.

First, as I try to replicate the metadata in my pre-v3 template, I’m not clearly seeing my results. For example, I create my own Photographer data and save it with a unique name. Then I do the same for the Rights fields saving them with a unique name. Then I tried to create a Preset that calls my Photographer and Rights data. So far, so good. However, when I “save” the Master Preset that is current, it saves but the Preset field goes blank. Although the Photographer and Rights fields still show my named sets. It seems to me that it would be preferable to continue to show the name of the Preset in use rather than displaying nothing.

Second issue: when I try to save the Master Preset, sometimes I get a warning to the effect “There are unsaved metadata. OK to lose?” which provokes anxiety but is not a helpful message because I have already saved the three presets I’ve described above. It it telling me I will lose the blank metadata fields that were the default? Although I saw this message multiple times tonight, I cannot recreate it just now. Do I need to do a SaveAs to a new name rather than reusing the old one, the convention I’m used to?

I’d love to have you say, “This is covered in the Manual. If you would take time to read it, all would be answered.” I might disagree with the the way you programmed it but I would understand it.

Thanks again for building such a great tool,
dj

I like the asterisk showing a “dirty” condition to prompt me to consider doing a save.

]]>